The Tamron SP is certainly superior in this respect. The image stabilizer (OS = optical stabilizer) is rated with an efficiency of up to 4 f-stops but we'd rather say it is about half of that in real life. The AF accuracy of the tested sample was relatively good albeit not perfect. The AF is virtually silent and quite fast. The lens features HSM, which is Sigma's version of an ultrasonic AF drive. Both the broad zoom ring as well as the smaller focus ring operate smoothly. On the downside, the lens extends when zooming out but the inner lens tube doesn't wobble even when fully extended. Sigma classifies this lens as dust and splash-proof - which is standard in this lens and price class, of course. The 24-70mm f/2.8 follows the design philosophy of all Sigma Art lenses thus the lens tube consists of a mixture of metal and TSC (Thermally Stable Composite) elements, giving an impression of very high if not great quality. The typical market price for the 24-70mm f/2.8 HSM DG OS ART is around the 1300USD/1200EUR mark - or about 100USD/EUR more than the Tamron lens albeit it's still way more affordable than the Canon L (~1700USD/1600EUR). So let's see how the Sigma performs especially compared to this lens. ![]() That being said, it is not unique in this respect - a few days ago we reviewed the Tamron SP 24-70mm f/2.8 Di VC USD G2 which features Tamron's variant of an image stabilizer and a good one apparently. While the optical specs don't offer anything unusual, it has at least one additional feature compared to its Canon counterpart - an image stabilizer - and that alone broadens the appeal quite a bit. One of those lenses is the Sigma 24-70mm f/2.8 HSM DG OS ART. Or maybe they are cool because they are expensive and everything expensive has to be good. ![]() On the other hand, they are undoubtedly popular - maybe because they are combining the best of both worlds thus they are "fast enough" plus provide the flexibility of a zoom lens. Furthermore, such lenses are heavy and less affordable compared to -say- a 24-105mm f/4. Is neither faster nor really any better prime lenses in this range nor is the range overly attractive really. Let's start this review with a little discussion - are 24-70mm f/2.8 lenses an attractive offering or just overhyped? Within our local team that's an open question. ![]() Review by Klaus Schroiff, published October 2018
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |